↓ Skip to main content

Consensus for Managing Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis in Children: A Systematic Review and Joint Statement From ECCO, ESPGHAN, and the Porto IBD Working Group of ESPGHAN

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Gastroenterology, April 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
141 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
173 Mendeley
Title
Consensus for Managing Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis in Children: A Systematic Review and Joint Statement From ECCO, ESPGHAN, and the Porto IBD Working Group of ESPGHAN
Published in
American Journal of Gastroenterology, April 2011
DOI 10.1038/ajg.2010.481
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dan Turner, Simon P L Travis, Anne M Griffiths, Frank M Ruemmele, Arie Levine, Eric I Benchimol, Marla Dubinsky, George Alex, Robert N Baldassano, Jacob C Langer, Robert Shamberger, Jeffrey S Hyams, Salvatore Cucchiara, Athos Bousvaros, Johanna C Escher, James Markowitz, David C Wilson, Gert van Assche, Richard K Russell

Abstract

Acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASC) is a potentially life-threatening disease. We aimed to formulate guidelines for managing ASC in children based on systematic review of the literature and robust consensus process. This manuscript is a product of a joint effort of the ECCO (European Crohn's and Colitis Organization), the Pediatric Porto Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) Working group of ESPGHAN (European Society of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition) and ESPGHAN.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 173 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Canada 2 1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 160 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 31 18%
Researcher 24 14%
Student > Master 20 12%
Student > Postgraduate 16 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 9%
Other 66 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 125 72%
Unspecified 16 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Other 15 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2019.
All research outputs
#4,033,193
of 13,511,623 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Gastroenterology
#1,448
of 3,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,677
of 232,716 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Gastroenterology
#30
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,511,623 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,466 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 232,716 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.