↓ Skip to main content

P27-5 便秘に対するキャラメル浣腸によりアナフィラキシーを呈した乳児の一例(P27 食物アレルギー・症例,ポスター,第60回日本アレルギー学会秋季学術大会)

Overview of attention for article published in Arerugī Allergy, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#36 of 226)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

3 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
P27-5 便秘に対するキャラメル浣腸によりアナフィラキシーを呈した乳児の一例(P27 食物アレルギー・症例,ポスター,第60回日本アレルギー学会秋季学術大会)
Published in
Arerugī Allergy, February 2017
DOI 10.15036/arerugi.59.1472_2

藤森 誠, 石田 明日香, 山川 陽子, 青柳 陽, 藤井 徹, 工藤 孝広, 大塚 宜一, 永田 智, 清水 俊明

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2017.
All research outputs
of 13,603,409 outputs
Outputs from Arerugī Allergy
of 226 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 316,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arerugī Allergy
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,603,409 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 226 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,594 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them