↓ Skip to main content

Understanding perceived risk of type 2 diabetes in healthy middle-aged adults: A cross-sectional study of associations with modelled risk, clinical risk factors, and psychological factors

Overview of attention for article published in Diabetes Research & Clinical Practice, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Understanding perceived risk of type 2 diabetes in healthy middle-aged adults: A cross-sectional study of associations with modelled risk, clinical risk factors, and psychological factors
Published in
Diabetes Research & Clinical Practice, December 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.diabres.2014.10.004
Pubmed ID
Authors

Job G. Godino, Esther M.F. van Sluijs, Stephen Sutton, Simon J. Griffin

Abstract

To determine the perceived risk of type 2 diabetes in a sample of healthy middle-aged adults and examine the association between perceived risk and modelled risk, clinical risk factors, and psychological factors theorised to be antecedents of behaviour change.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 78 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 20%
Researcher 11 14%
Unspecified 8 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 10%
Other 17 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 35%
Psychology 11 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 13%
Unspecified 9 11%
Social Sciences 7 9%
Other 14 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2014.
All research outputs
#7,008,313
of 11,842,911 outputs
Outputs from Diabetes Research & Clinical Practice
#952
of 1,571 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,591
of 210,203 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetes Research & Clinical Practice
#11
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,842,911 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,571 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,203 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.