↓ Skip to main content

Time-reversed adapted-perturbation (TRAP) optical focusing onto dynamic objects inside scattering media

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Photonics, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
10 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
2 X users
patent
6 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
122 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
152 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Time-reversed adapted-perturbation (TRAP) optical focusing onto dynamic objects inside scattering media
Published in
Nature Photonics, November 2014
DOI 10.1038/nphoton.2014.251
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cheng Ma, Xiao Xu, Yan Liu, Lihong V. Wang

Abstract

The ability to steer and focus light inside scattering media has long been sought for a multitude of applications. To form optical foci inside scattering media, the only feasible strategy at present is to guide photons by using either implanted(1) or virtual(2-4) guide stars, which can be inconvenient and limits potential applications. Here, we report a scheme for focusing light inside scattering media by employing intrinsic dynamics as guide stars. By time-reversing the perturbed component of the scattered light adaptively, we show that it is possible to focus light to the origin of the perturbation. Using the approach, we demonstrate non-invasive dynamic light focusing onto moving targets and imaging of a time-variant object obscured by highly scattering media. Anticipated applications include imaging and photoablation of angiogenic vessels in tumours as well as other biomedical uses.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Unknown 148 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 60 39%
Researcher 18 12%
Student > Master 18 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 5%
Other 14 9%
Unknown 26 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 56 37%
Physics and Astronomy 54 36%
Computer Science 3 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 1%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 1%
Other 6 4%
Unknown 29 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 103. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2022.
All research outputs
#341,277
of 22,769,322 outputs
Outputs from Nature Photonics
#172
of 2,478 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,874
of 261,400 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Photonics
#6
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,769,322 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,478 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 261,400 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.