↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of ivermectin mass drug administration for malaria transmission control across different West African environments

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
29 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
83 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
157 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluation of ivermectin mass drug administration for malaria transmission control across different West African environments
Published in
Malaria Journal, November 2014
DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-13-417
Pubmed ID
Authors

Haoues Alout, Benjamin J Krajacich, Jacob I Meyers, Nathan D Grubaugh, Doug E Brackney, Kevin C Kobylinski, Joseph W Diclaro, Fatorma K Bolay, Lawrence S Fakoli, Abdoulaye Diabaté, Roch K Dabiré, Roland W Bougma, Brian D Foy

Abstract

Mass drug administration (MDA) of ivermectin to humans for control and elimination of filarial parasites can kill biting malaria vectors and lead to Plasmodium transmission reduction. This study examines the degree and duration of mosquitocidal effects resulting from single MDAs conducted in three different West African countries, and the subsequent reductions in parity and Plasmodium sporozoite rates.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 153 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 34 22%
Student > Master 23 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 14%
Student > Bachelor 17 11%
Student > Postgraduate 10 6%
Other 20 13%
Unknown 31 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 25 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 6%
Environmental Science 7 4%
Other 25 16%
Unknown 39 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2023.
All research outputs
#937,967
of 23,416,487 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#132
of 5,670 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,315
of 263,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#4
of 128 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,416,487 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,670 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,830 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 128 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.