Thanks for the reminder
@ZeichenTaten @ThomasRadetzki_ @MartinHaeusling @JuliaKloeckner Oder auch hier : https://t.co/Q660xJHPBW
@OhneGentechnik @GeraldJtb @JuliaKloeckner @bmel @LZnetNEWS Und hier liegt das Problem fehlender Wissenschaftlichkeit und Überblick: https://t.co/8VLq8sPgob Lesen hilft! Und Ideologie hinterfragen erst recht.
@verflucht @EmmaKennedy you are most welcome. you may also find these interesting https://t.co/ieCR1WvVVc & https://t.co/S2VObYAbAp also happy to answer any more/specific QQs.
@weh_oh Ja. Das mag man politisch als Problem sehen, aber die Vorstellung, dass das allein der wichtigste Grund für Welthunger sei, ist absurd. Abgesehen davon gibt es dazu Belege von @WilhelmKluemper u @MatinQaim, die in eine völlig andere Richtung weisen
@DrScratch @doug20911 @AstroRainbow @emma_ducros Si on regarde un meta-analyse sur l'adoption des OGM, on observe une baisse de 37% des phytosanitaires grâce aux OGM et notamment les OGM Bt (qui se protègent des insectes) https://t.co/csC7JESXMn https://
RT @prometheusgreen: @FarmChicJodi the last 50 years have been marked by massive improvements to farming sustainability and reducing enviro…
@FarmChicJodi the last 50 years have been marked by massive improvements to farming sustainability and reducing environmental impacts, accelerated by the adoption of GM seeds in major commodities. https://t.co/ieCR1WvVVc & https://t.co/ZlGah8AVtN https
@thierrytwitch @EksTakumi @MacLesggy @lemondefr @Anses_fr Dans le cadre d'une volonté de baisser la quantité de phytosanitaires, le génie génétique apporte des solutions concrètes qu'on ne peut refuser. C'est le cas avec les OGM transgéniques : https://t
@CKellyBisson It is about the political manipulation of science, which is what eNGOs excel at. It's a tradegy they manipulate science for financial gain, meanwhile developing country farmers suffer needless losses. https://t.co/o6Ol0GoELd
@Joseph_Garnier @B_Rouille_Idele @emma_ducros @DecodAgri https://t.co/csC7JESXMn Les quantités peuvent augmenter dans le cas des VTH mais au global, il y a réduction. Des remarques dans ce sens ont été faites à @DecodAgri sans que ça soit repris en compt
@NanciGuestRDPhD @CakeNutrition @CommonGroundNow "On average, GM technology adoption has reduced chemical pesticide use by 37%, increased crop yields by 22%, and increased farmer profits by 68%." https://t.co/cRoqWvqbnV
@biosteward GM crops increase yields 22% above conventional. Great to see you call scientists liars. Always pleased to provide facts and evidence that refute propaganda. https://t.co/o6Ol0GoELd
@rps23r67k @mem_somerville @garyruskin @USRightToKnow @StacyMalkan @usask GM crops increase farmer profitability by 68%. GM crops are a tremendous fiscal benefit for farmers. It's disgusting that groups like USRTK want to reduce farm incomes. https://t.co/
RT @josephmjauregui: Transgénicos: ¿buenos o malos? Metanálisis de 147 papers evaluó impactos agronómicos y económicos de los OGM. https:…
RT @josephmjauregui: Transgénicos: ¿buenos o malos? Metanálisis de 147 papers evaluó impactos agronómicos y económicos de los OGM. https:…
RT @josephmjauregui: Transgénicos: ¿buenos o malos? Metanálisis de 147 papers evaluó impactos agronómicos y económicos de los OGM. https:…
RT @josephmjauregui: Transgénicos: ¿buenos o malos? Metanálisis de 147 papers evaluó impactos agronómicos y económicos de los OGM. https:…
RT @josephmjauregui: Transgénicos: ¿buenos o malos? Metanálisis de 147 papers evaluó impactos agronómicos y económicos de los OGM. https:…
RT @josephmjauregui: Transgénicos: ¿buenos o malos? Metanálisis de 147 papers evaluó impactos agronómicos y económicos de los OGM. https:…
RT @josephmjauregui: Transgénicos: ¿buenos o malos? Metanálisis de 147 papers evaluó impactos agronómicos y económicos de los OGM. https:…
RT @josephmjauregui: Transgénicos: ¿buenos o malos? Metanálisis de 147 papers evaluó impactos agronómicos y económicos de los OGM. https:…
RT @josephmjauregui: Transgénicos: ¿buenos o malos? Metanálisis de 147 papers evaluó impactos agronómicos y económicos de los OGM. https:…
RT @josephmjauregui: Transgénicos: ¿buenos o malos? Metanálisis de 147 papers evaluó impactos agronómicos y económicos de los OGM. https:…
Pero para los hippies es malo usar transgenicos, se les chocan las ideas pobres
RT @josephmjauregui: Transgénicos: ¿buenos o malos? Metanálisis de 147 papers evaluó impactos agronómicos y económicos de los OGM. https:…
RT @josephmjauregui: Transgénicos: ¿buenos o malos? Metanálisis de 147 papers evaluó impactos agronómicos y económicos de los OGM. https:…
Transgénicos: ¿buenos o malos? Metanálisis de 147 papers evaluó impactos agronómicos y económicos de los OGM. https://t.co/1E7pMajNEi Principales conclusiones 🟢21.6% incremento de rinde 🟢36.9% menos cantidad pesticidas 🟢68.2% incremento renta 🔴3.3% inc
@ECongrooo Os melhores estudos indicam que não há malefícios ao meio ambiente e à saúde humana e animal entre as variedades aprovadas e em uso: https://t.co/OU3mbp4t7O
@GoodStuffNW @EvelynKissinge2 @GRAIN_org @careygillam @nickykylegarden There is quite rich scientific literature telling exactly the opposite, eg https://t.co/SvpIF29Vbd . It might be complicated with HT crops because they lead to the replacement of one he
Book marking b/c I can’t remember if I read this before or not https://t.co/Xj692nZnGB
RT @AYlhainen: ”GM technology adoption has reduced chemical pesticide use by 37%, increased crop yields by 22%, and increased farmer profit…
This is the best of twitter and science. We disagree on something (our perspective, not on facts) and that is not the end of discussion. I am eager to read this paper carefully a few times.
RT @KollmarMartin: @MartinHaeusling Hier Resultat einer Meta-Studie: "On average, GM technology adoption has reduced chemical pesticide use…
@MartinHaeusling Hier Resultat einer Meta-Studie: "On average, GM technology adoption has reduced chemical pesticide use by 37%, increased crop yields by 22%, and increased farmer profits by 68%." Mehr GM-tech, oder? https://t.co/SQvZGlH1Hi
RT @stuartsmyth66: Compared to conventional crops, USDA data shows average organic yield lag of 28% for row crops. Qaim shows GM crops yiel…
RT @AYlhainen: ”GM technology adoption has reduced chemical pesticide use by 37%, increased crop yields by 22%, and increased farmer profit…
RT @AYlhainen: ”GM technology adoption has reduced chemical pesticide use by 37%, increased crop yields by 22%, and increased farmer profit…
RT @AYlhainen: ”GM technology adoption has reduced chemical pesticide use by 37%, increased crop yields by 22%, and increased farmer profit…
RT @AYlhainen: ”GM technology adoption has reduced chemical pesticide use by 37%, increased crop yields by 22%, and increased farmer profit…
Euroopan unioni ampuu itseään jalkaan suhtautuessaan niin nuivasti GM-teknologiaan.
RT @AYlhainen: ”GM technology adoption has reduced chemical pesticide use by 37%, increased crop yields by 22%, and increased farmer profit…
RT @AYlhainen: ”GM technology adoption has reduced chemical pesticide use by 37%, increased crop yields by 22%, and increased farmer profit…
RT @AYlhainen: ”GM technology adoption has reduced chemical pesticide use by 37%, increased crop yields by 22%, and increased farmer profit…
RT @stuartsmyth66: Compared to conventional crops, USDA data shows average organic yield lag of 28% for row crops. Qaim shows GM crops yiel…
RT @stuartsmyth66: Compared to conventional crops, USDA data shows average organic yield lag of 28% for row crops. Qaim shows GM crops yiel…
RT @stuartsmyth66: Compared to conventional crops, USDA data shows average organic yield lag of 28% for row crops. Qaim shows GM crops yiel…
RT @stuartsmyth66: Compared to conventional crops, USDA data shows average organic yield lag of 28% for row crops. Qaim shows GM crops yiel…
RT @AYlhainen: ”GM technology adoption has reduced chemical pesticide use by 37%, increased crop yields by 22%, and increased farmer profit…
RT @stuartsmyth66: Compared to conventional crops, USDA data shows average organic yield lag of 28% for row crops. Qaim shows GM crops yiel…
”GM technology adoption has reduced chemical pesticide use by 37%, increased crop yields by 22%, and increased farmer profits by 68%. Yield and profit gains are higher in developing countries than in developed countries.” https://t.co/55SZDpmC2v
RT @stuartsmyth66: Compared to conventional crops, USDA data shows average organic yield lag of 28% for row crops. Qaim shows GM crops yiel…
RT @stuartsmyth66: Compared to conventional crops, USDA data shows average organic yield lag of 28% for row crops. Qaim shows GM crops yiel…
RT @stuartsmyth66: Compared to conventional crops, USDA data shows average organic yield lag of 28% for row crops. Qaim shows GM crops yiel…
RT @stuartsmyth66: Compared to conventional crops, USDA data shows average organic yield lag of 28% for row crops. Qaim shows GM crops yiel…
RT @stuartsmyth66: Compared to conventional crops, USDA data shows average organic yield lag of 28% for row crops. Qaim shows GM crops yiel…
RT @stuartsmyth66: Compared to conventional crops, USDA data shows average organic yield lag of 28% for row crops. Qaim shows GM crops yiel…
RT @stuartsmyth66: Compared to conventional crops, USDA data shows average organic yield lag of 28% for row crops. Qaim shows GM crops yiel…
Compared to conventional crops, USDA data shows average organic yield lag of 28% for row crops. Qaim shows GM crops yield 22% more. GM crops yield 69% above organic. The FAO needs to reject agroecology as a food security solution. https://t.co/2FzC8O49ck h
@janetw65 @PieterseMarc Nee hoor. https://t.co/AV1lpCZ2FX
@biosteward Thanks for confirming you reject scientific facts & evidence. Always glad to refute activist propaganda. Organic crops yield one-third less than conventional. GM crops yield 22% above conventional. Easy to tell where the future lies https:/
@louispickletown @HomegrownJoan @Resourceful1942 @kenjaques Thank you for the personal attack. It's always great to see that evidence threatens activist propaganda. Innovations in ag have been beneficial for humans & the environment. Many activists are
@AnkurKaithwas @Greenpeace every bit of the vast amount of data and exerience we have contradicts your claims. no data and no experience supports them. https://t.co/mOZCPlzMN9 & https://t.co/ZlGah8AVtN & https://t.co/ieCR1WvVVc https://t.co/IoftCd
@habichhoa (1/n) Quelques études. Diminution des carbon emissions + diminution des pesticides: https://t.co/oAvPyapnLT + https://t.co/NAZS3Sdyb6. Plus de production pour moins de terrain utilisé = moins de déforestation: https://t.co/v2IQDMl2dF.
@Eric_OGrey I think @Botanygeek did an analysis of this, but I can’t find it. It’s a lot more complex than organic is more nutritious, and that evidence is weak. Here’s a meta analysis on pesticide conclusions. https://t.co/cRoqWvqbnV
@CKellyBisson NAS was looking at risk, not impacts. GM technology adoption has reduced chemical pesticide use by 37%, increased crop yields by 22%, and increased farmer profits by 68%. Pretty significant impact. https://t.co/o6Ol0GoELd
RT @stuartsmyth66: @Resourceful1942 @HomegrownJoan @peterdoodes @USRightToKnow Thank you for publicly confirming you're opposed to farmers…
@Resourceful1942 @HomegrownJoan @peterdoodes @USRightToKnow Thank you for publicly confirming you're opposed to farmers being more profitable. GM crops reduce chemical pesticide (37%), increased crop yields (22%), and increased farmer profits (68%). It hel
@Farmerssustain @ganikol @prometheusgreen @RippleCreekNW @JoannaBlythman @GMWatch @gatesfoundation @EPA @edgeben @pdqbach55 @BioBeef @AgBioWorld This is incorrect. GM crops have reduced chemical use by 37%. https://t.co/o6Ol0G73TF
@12Bly @TeodorBruu @Partiet For det første må du klare å skille mellom MDG og GU før du kritiserer andre for å ikke skille mellom ting. For det andre har du her en metastudie med 147 studier som sier du tar feil: https://t.co/6I5vgnVeuY https://t.co/ImSAz
@FeldonForest @JoannaBlythman @GMWatch vested interests as in organic farmers vs independent think tankers. right. meanwhile, what do the data say? https://t.co/IYeZLMBJ0a & https://t.co/ZlGah8AVtN & https://t.co/ieCR1WvVVc & https://t.co/FvM
@Olivefarmer @bdowduribe @Stylopidae Thank you for publicly confirming you lie about the benefits of GM crops. "GM technology adoption has reduced chemical pesticide use by 37%, increased crop yields by 22%, and increased farmer profits by 68%." https://t.