↓ Skip to main content

Testicular tumors in prepubescent patients

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Pediatric Surgery (Science Direct), October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Testicular tumors in prepubescent patients
Published in
Journal of Pediatric Surgery (Science Direct), October 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.09.020
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ilan I. Maizlin, Matthew Dellinger, Kenneth W. Gow, Adam B. Goldin, Melanie Goldfarb, Jed G. Nuchtern, Monica Langer, Sanjeev A. Vasudevan, John J. Doski, Mehul V. Raval, Elizabeth A. Beierle

Abstract

Pediatric testicular tumors are rare, constituting only 1% of all pediatric solid tumors. Single-institution studies addressing pediatric testicular tumors published to date have been limited in the number of patients. We utilized the National Cancer Data Base (1998-2012) to review all prepubescent patients (≤12 years old) with testicular neoplasms. Demographics, tumor characteristics, treatment modalities, and outcomes were abstracted. A total of 479 patients were identified, with a median age of 3 years (IQR 0-4) at diagnosis. 67% of cases were diagnosed by 3 years of age. Yolk sac tumors were the most common histology (202 patients, 42.2%). Most tumors were diagnosed at a low stage. Resection was performed in 465 boys, with 75% having undergone radical orchiectomies. Chemotherapy was utilized in 28% of cases and radiotherapy in 7%. With mean follow-up of 5.6 years, mortality rate was 3%. No difference in mortality was noted based on histology or extent of surgical resection. This series of prepubertal testicular tumors is the largest yet reported and highlights the patient demographics, tumor characteristics, treatment modalities and outcomes for these tumors. Prognosis study LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 18%
Researcher 4 12%
Other 3 9%
Student > Master 3 9%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 11 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 56%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Unknown 13 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2018.
All research outputs
#19,951,180
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pediatric Surgery (Science Direct)
#3,570
of 4,583 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#244,011
of 334,523 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pediatric Surgery (Science Direct)
#62
of 124 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,583 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,523 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 124 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.