You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
Assessing miR-451 Activity and Its Role in Erythropoiesis
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 12 |
Book title |
Argonaute Proteins
|
Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2018
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-7339-2_12 |
Pubmed ID | |
Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-7338-5, 978-1-4939-7339-2
|
Authors |
Dmitry A. Kretov, Andrew M. Shafik, Daniel Cifuentes, Kretov, Dmitry A., Shafik, Andrew M., Cifuentes, Daniel |
Abstract |
The ability to microinject small RNAs and mRNAs into zebrafish embryos, of different genetic backgrounds, allows for the precise dissection of microRNA processing pathways at the molecular level, while simultaneously provides insight into their physiologic role. Here, we apply such an approach to determine the impact of Argonaute 2 in the processing of miR-451, a vertebrate-specific microRNA required for terminal erythrocyte differentiation. This was achieved using fluorescent microRNA reporter sensor assays and phenotype rescue experiments. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 2 | 25% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 25% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 13% |
Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 13% |
Unspecified | 1 | 13% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 1 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 50% |
Unspecified | 1 | 13% |
Computer Science | 1 | 13% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 1 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2018.
All research outputs
#15,482,347
of 23,007,053 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#5,388
of 13,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#269,706
of 442,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#596
of 1,498 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,007,053 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,157 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,275 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,498 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.