You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
#TwittIR: Understanding and Establishing a Twitter Ecosystem for Interventional Radiologists and Their Practices
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the American College of Radiology, January 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.09.011 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vibhor Wadhwa, Aaron Brandis, Kumar Madassery, Peder E. Horner, Sabeen Dhand, Peter Bream, Aaron Shiloh, Mark L. Lessne, Robert K. Ryu |
| Abstract |
The use of social media among interventional radiologists is increasing, with Twitter receiving the most attention. Twitter is an ideal forum for open exchange of ideas from around the world. However, it is important for Twitter users to gain a rudimentary understanding of the many potential communication pathways to connect with other users. An intentional approach to Twitter is vital to efficient and successful use. This article describes several common communication pathways that can be utilized by physicians in their interventional radiology practice. |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 71 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 45 | 63% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 10% |
| Spain | 2 | 3% |
| China | 1 | 1% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| Singapore | 1 | 1% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 13 | 18% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 34 | 48% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 30 | 42% |
| Scientists | 5 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 36 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 19% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 11% |
| Researcher | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 7 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 50% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 8 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2018.
All research outputs
#815,278
of 23,852,694 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American College of Radiology
#153
of 3,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,025
of 448,365 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American College of Radiology
#15
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,852,694 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,308 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,365 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.