↓ Skip to main content

Magnetic functionalities in MOFs: from the framework to the pore

Overview of attention for article published in Chemical Society Reviews, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
266 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
262 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Magnetic functionalities in MOFs: from the framework to the pore
Published in
Chemical Society Reviews, January 2018
DOI 10.1039/c7cs00653e
Pubmed ID
Authors

Guillermo Mínguez Espallargas, Eugenio Coronado

Abstract

In this review, we show the different approaches developed so far to prepare metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) presenting electronic functionalities, with particular attention to magnetic properties. We will cover the chemical design of frameworks necessary for the incorporation of different magnetic phenomena, as well as the encapsulation of functional species in their pores leading to hybrid multifunctional MOFs combining an extended lattice with a molecular lattice.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 262 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 262 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 60 23%
Researcher 36 14%
Student > Master 34 13%
Student > Bachelor 19 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 5%
Other 45 17%
Unknown 54 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 126 48%
Materials Science 21 8%
Physics and Astronomy 10 4%
Chemical Engineering 8 3%
Engineering 5 2%
Other 17 6%
Unknown 75 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2017.
All research outputs
#6,935,729
of 12,140,050 outputs
Outputs from Chemical Society Reviews
#1,620
of 2,289 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,754
of 285,351 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chemical Society Reviews
#37
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,140,050 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,289 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,351 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.