↓ Skip to main content

Can a text message a week improve breastfeeding?

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
85 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
343 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Can a text message a week improve breastfeeding?
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, November 2014
DOI 10.1186/s12884-014-0374-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Danielle Gallegos, Rebekah Russell-Bennett, Josephine Previte, Joy Parkinson

Abstract

BackgroundBreastfeeding is recognised as the optimal method for feeding infants with health gains made by reducing infectious diseases in infancy; and chronic diseases, including obesity, in childhood, adolescence and adulthood. Despite this, exclusivity and duration in developed countries remains resistant to improvement. The objectives of this research were to test if an automated mobile phone text messaging intervention, delivering one text message a week, could increase ¿any¿ breastfeeding rates and improve breastfeeding self-efficacy and coping.MethodsWomen were eligible to participate if they were: over eighteen years; had an infant less than three months old; were currently breastfeeding; no diagnosed mental illness; and used a mobile phone. Women in the intervention group received MumBubConnect, a text messaging service with automated responses delivered once a week for 8 weeks. Women in the comparison group received their usual care and were sampled two years after the intervention group. Data collection included online surveys at two time points, week zero and week nine, to measure breastfeeding exclusivity and duration, coping, emotions, accountability and self-efficacy. A range of statistical analyses were used to test for differences between groups. Hierarchical regression was used to investigate change in breastfeeding outcome, between groups, adjusting for co-variates.ResultsThe intervention group had 120 participants at commencement and 114 at completion, the comparison group had 114 participants at commencement and 86 at completion. MumBubConnect had a positive impact on the primary outcome of breastfeeding behaviors with women receiving the intervention more likely to continue exclusive breastfeeding; with a 6% decrease in exclusive breastfeeding in the intervention group, compared to a 14% decrease in the comparison group (p¿<¿0.001). This remained significant after controlling for infant age, mother¿s income, education and delivery type (p¿=¿0.04). Women in the intervention group demonstrated active coping and were less likely to display emotions-focussed coping (p¿<¿.001). There was no discernible statistical effect on self-efficacy or accountability.ConclusionsA fully automated text messaging services appears to improve exclusive breastfeeding duration. The service provides a well-accepted, personalised support service that empowers women to actively resolve breastfeeding issues.Trial registrationAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12614001091695.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 343 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 341 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 62 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 11%
Student > Bachelor 37 11%
Researcher 33 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 24 7%
Other 66 19%
Unknown 82 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 74 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 64 19%
Psychology 32 9%
Social Sciences 26 8%
Computer Science 10 3%
Other 42 12%
Unknown 95 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2020.
All research outputs
#3,312,561
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#917
of 4,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,300
of 265,370 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#11
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,379 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,370 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.