↓ Skip to main content

Is a specialist breathlessness service more effective and cost-effective for patients with advanced cancer and their carers than standard care? Findings of a mixed-method randomised controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
37 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
109 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
178 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Is a specialist breathlessness service more effective and cost-effective for patients with advanced cancer and their carers than standard care? Findings of a mixed-method randomised controlled trial
Published in
BMC Medicine, October 2014
DOI 10.1186/s12916-014-0194-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Morag C Farquhar, A Toby Prevost, Paul McCrone, Barbara Brafman-Price, Allison Bentley, Irene J Higginson, Chris Todd, Sara Booth

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 178 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Spain 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 173 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 38 21%
Researcher 25 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 11%
Other 16 9%
Student > Bachelor 14 8%
Other 39 22%
Unknown 26 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 52 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 33 19%
Psychology 27 15%
Social Sciences 9 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Other 20 11%
Unknown 33 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2018.
All research outputs
#460,763
of 14,262,606 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#380
of 2,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,011
of 234,945 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#43
of 242 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,262,606 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,229 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 234,945 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 242 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.