↓ Skip to main content

Exploration of molecular genetic etiology for Korean cochlear implantees with severe to profound hearing loss and its implication

Overview of attention for article published in Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Exploration of molecular genetic etiology for Korean cochlear implantees with severe to profound hearing loss and its implication
Published in
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, November 2014
DOI 10.1186/s13023-014-0167-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joo Hyun Park, Nayoung K D Kim, Ah Reum Kim, Jihye Rhee, Seung Ha Oh, Ja-Won Koo, Jae-Yong Nam, Woong-Yang Park, Byung Yoon Choi

Abstract

Severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) requires cochlear implantation (CI) for auditory rehabilitation. Etiologic diagnoses can contribute to candidacy selection and decision-making regarding the timing of successful CI. However, few studies have been performed to address the etiologic spectrum of severe SNHL in the population where there is no consanguineous marriage and the majority of SNHL cases are sporadic in small sized families. The authors sought to comprehensively understand the etiologies of Korean cochlear implantees by incorporating the targeted resequencing of 204 candidate deafness genes (TRS-204) and a phenotype-driven candidate gene approach.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 28%
Other 4 14%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 10%
Student > Postgraduate 3 10%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 5 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 21%
Social Sciences 2 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 7%
Linguistics 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 7 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2014.
All research outputs
#2,900,844
of 4,507,652 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#574
of 775 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,687
of 126,306 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#61
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,507,652 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 775 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 126,306 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.