↓ Skip to main content

Buffeted by Culture: Urban Planners, Notional Places, and Narratives of Fakery

Overview of attention for article published in Planning Theory & Practice, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Buffeted by Culture: Urban Planners, Notional Places, and Narratives of Fakery
Published in
Planning Theory & Practice, November 2017
DOI 10.1080/14649357.2017.1393171
Authors

Stephen Rowley

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 50%
Student > Master 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 50%
Social Sciences 1 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2017.
All research outputs
#9,686,911
of 12,114,353 outputs
Outputs from Planning Theory & Practice
#169
of 193 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#206,910
of 285,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Planning Theory & Practice
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,114,353 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,223 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.