You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Dark-matter hunt fails to find the elusive particles
|
|---|---|
| Published by |
Nature, November 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1038/551153a |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elizabeth Gibney |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 453 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 87 | 19% |
| United Kingdom | 40 | 9% |
| Spain | 13 | 3% |
| Canada | 11 | 2% |
| Japan | 10 | 2% |
| Germany | 9 | 2% |
| France | 8 | 2% |
| India | 7 | 2% |
| Mexico | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 68 | 15% |
| Unknown | 193 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 348 | 77% |
| Scientists | 90 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 9 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 2 | 25% |
| Researcher | 2 | 25% |
| Professor | 1 | 13% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 13% |
| Other | 1 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 38% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 25% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 13% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 423. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2023.
All research outputs
#69,538
of 25,746,891 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#5,265
of 98,656 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,460
of 343,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#88
of 1,020 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,746,891 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,656 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,741 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,020 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.