You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Erratum: Large meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies identifies five loci for lean body mass
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, November 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41467-017-01008-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
M. Carola Zillikens, Serkalem Demissie, Yi-Hsiang Hsu, Laura M. Yerges-Armstrong, Wen-Chi Chou, Lisette Stolk, Gregory Livshits, Linda Broer, Toby Johnson, Daniel L. Koller, Zoltán Kutalik, Jian’an Luan, Ida Malkin, Janina S. Ried, Albert V. Smith, Gudmar Thorleifsson, Liesbeth Vandenput, Jing Hua Zhao, Weihua Zhang, Ali Aghdassi, Kristina Åkesson, Najaf Amin, Leslie J. Baier, Inês Barroso, David A. Bennett, Lars Bertram, Rainer Biffar, Murielle Bochud, Michael Boehnke, Ingrid B. Borecki, Aron S. Buchman, Liisa Byberg, Harry Campbell, Natalia Campos Obanda, Jane A. Cauley, Peggy M. Cawthon, Henna Cederberg, Zhao Chen, Nam H. Cho, Hyung Jin Choi, Melina Claussnitzer, Francis Collins, Steven R. Cummings, Philip L. De Jager, Ilja Demuth, Rosalie A. M. Dhonukshe-Rutten, Luda Diatchenko, Gudny Eiriksdottir, Anke W. Enneman, Mike Erdos, Johan G. Eriksson, Joel Eriksson, Karol Estrada, Daniel S. Evans, Mary F. Feitosa, Mao Fu, Melissa Garcia, Christian Gieger, Thomas Girke, Nicole L. Glazer, Harald Grallert, Jagvir Grewal, Bok-Ghee Han, Robert L. Hanson, Caroline Hayward, Albert Hofman, Eric P. Hoffman, Georg Homuth, Wen-Chi Hsueh, Monica J. Hubal, Alan Hubbard, Kim M. Huffman, Lise B. Husted, Thomas Illig, Erik Ingelsson, Till Ittermann, John-Olov Jansson, Joanne M. Jordan, Antti Jula, Magnus Karlsson, Kay-Tee Khaw, Tuomas O. Kilpeläinen, Norman Klopp, Jacqueline S. L. Kloth, Heikki A. Koistinen, William E. Kraus, Stephen Kritchevsky, Teemu Kuulasmaa, Johanna Kuusisto, Markku Laakso, Jari Lahti, Thomas Lang, Bente L. Langdahl, Lenore J. Launer, Jong-Young Lee, Markus M. Lerch, Joshua R. Lewis, Lars Lind, Cecilia Lindgren, Yongmei Liu, Tian Liu, Youfang Liu, Östen Ljunggren, Mattias Lorentzon, Robert N. Luben, William Maixner, Fiona E. McGuigan, Carolina Medina-Gomez, Thomas Meitinger, Håkan Melhus, Dan Mellström, Simon Melov, Karl Michaëlsson, Braxton D. Mitchell, Andrew P. Morris, Leif Mosekilde, Anne Newman, Carrie M. Nielson, Jeffrey R. O’Connell, Ben A. Oostra, Eric S. Orwoll, Aarno Palotie, Stephen C. J. Parker, Munro Peacock, Markus Perola, Annette Peters, Ozren Polasek, Richard L. Prince, Katri Räikkönen, Stuart H. Ralston, Samuli Ripatti, John A. Robbins, Jerome I. Rotter, Igor Rudan, Veikko Salomaa, Suzanne Satterfield, Eric E. Schadt, Sabine Schipf, Laura Scott, Joban Sehmi, Jian Shen, Chan Soo Shin, Gunnar Sigurdsson, Shad Smith, Nicole Soranzo, Alena Stančáková, Elisabeth Steinhagen-Thiessen, Elizabeth A. Streeten, Unnur Styrkarsdottir, Karin M. A. Swart, Sian-Tsung Tan, Mark A. Tarnopolsky, Patricia Thompson, Cynthia A. Thomson, Unnur Thorsteinsdottir, Emmi Tikkanen, Gregory J. Tranah, Jaakko Tuomilehto, Natasja M. van Schoor, Arjun Verma, Peter Vollenweider, Henry Völzke, Jean Wactawski-Wende, Mark Walker, Michael N. Weedon, Ryan Welch, H.-Erich Wichmann, Elisabeth Widen, Frances M. K. Williams, James F. Wilson, Nicole C. Wright, Weijia Xie, Lei Yu, Yanhua Zhou, John C. Chambers, Angela Döring, Cornelia M. van Duijn, Michael J. Econs, Vilmundur Gudnason, Jaspal S. Kooner, Bruce M. Psaty, Timothy D. Spector, Kari Stefansson, Fernando Rivadeneira, André G. Uitterlinden, Nicholas J. Wareham, Vicky Ossowski, Dawn Waterworth, Ruth J. F. Loos, David Karasik, Tamara B. Harris, Claes Ohlsson, Douglas P. Kiel |
| Abstract |
A correction to this article has been published and is linked from the HTML version of this article. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 83 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 1% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 1% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 1% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 79 | 95% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 1% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 79 | 95% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2017.
All research outputs
#15,680,078
of 23,301,510 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#43,091
of 48,171 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#208,543
of 332,205 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#1,371
of 1,527 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,301,510 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 48,171 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 56.1. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,205 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,527 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.