You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The Impact of Social Media on Readership of a Peer-Reviewed Medical Journal
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of the American College of Radiology, November 2014
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.jacr.2014.07.029 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
C. Matthew Hawkins, Bruce J. Hillman, Ruth C. Carlos, James V. Rawson, Rebecca Haines, Richard Duszak |
Abstract |
Social media microblogging has made major inroads in physician education and information exchange. The authors evaluated their early experience with Twitter "tweet chat" sessions as a medium to expand the reach and audience of a peer-reviewed radiology journal. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 15 | 45% |
India | 5 | 15% |
Canada | 2 | 6% |
Spain | 1 | 3% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
Australia | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 8 | 24% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 16 | 48% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 13 | 39% |
Scientists | 3 | 9% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 3% |
Spain | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 66 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 10 | 14% |
Student > Master | 10 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 13% |
Researcher | 6 | 9% |
Professor | 5 | 7% |
Other | 18 | 26% |
Unknown | 11 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 35% |
Computer Science | 8 | 12% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 6% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 6% |
Other | 9 | 13% |
Unknown | 16 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2017.
All research outputs
#1,669,120
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American College of Radiology
#408
of 3,479 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,269
of 275,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American College of Radiology
#4
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,479 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,741 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.