↓ Skip to main content

Multinational corporations and infectious disease: Embracing human rights management techniques

Overview of attention for article published in Infectious Diseases of Poverty, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Multinational corporations and infectious disease: Embracing human rights management techniques
Published in
Infectious Diseases of Poverty, November 2014
DOI 10.1186/2049-9957-3-39
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kendyl Salcito, Burton H Singer, Mitchell G Weiss, Mirko S Winkler, Gary R Krieger, Mark Wielga, Jürg Utzinger

Abstract

Global health institutions have called for governments, international organisations and health practitioners to employ a human rights-based approach to infectious diseases. The motivation for a human rights approach is clear: poverty and inequality create conditions for infectious diseases to thrive, and the diseases, in turn, interact with social-ecological systems to promulgate poverty, inequity and indignity. Governments and intergovernmental organisations should be concerned with the control and elimination of these diseases, as widespread infections delay economic growth and contribute to higher healthcare costs and slower processes for realising universal human rights. These social determinants and economic outcomes associated with infectious diseases should interest multinational companies, partly because they have bearing on corporate productivity and, increasingly, because new global norms impose on companies a responsibility to respect human rights, including the right to health.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 68 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 12%
Researcher 7 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 16 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 12 18%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 7%
Environmental Science 5 7%
Other 16 24%
Unknown 19 28%