You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The secretome of induced pluripotent stem cells reduces lung fibrosis in part by hepatocyte growth factor
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Stem Cell Research & Therapy, November 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/scrt513 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Amiq Gazdhar, Iwona Grad, Luca Tamò, Mathias Gugger, Anis Feki, Thomas Geiser |
| Abstract |
Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a progressive and irreversible fibrotic lung disease, resulting in respiratory insufficiency and reduced survival. Pulmonary fibrosis is a result of repeated alveolar epithelial microinjuries, followed by abnormal regeneration and repair processes in the lung. Recently, stem cells and their secretome have been investigated as a novel therapeutic approach in pulmonary fibrosis. We evaluated the potential of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC) conditioned media (iPSC-cm) to regenerate and repair the alveolar epithelium in vitro and improve bleomycin induced lung injury in vivo. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 29% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 2 | 14% |
| Spain | 1 | 7% |
| Colombia | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 6 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 64% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 14% |
| Scientists | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 78 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 15 | 19% |
| Unknown | 19 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 11% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 9% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 14% |
| Unknown | 21 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2016.
All research outputs
#1,297,389
of 23,318,744 outputs
Outputs from Stem Cell Research & Therapy
#58
of 2,455 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,800
of 261,861 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Stem Cell Research & Therapy
#4
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,318,744 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,455 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 261,861 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.