| Title |
Independent recruitment of a novel seed dispersal system by camel crickets in achlorophyllous plants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
New Phytologist, November 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1111/nph.14859 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kenji Suetsugu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2,404 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 684 | 28% |
| China | 11 | <1% |
| Austria | 10 | <1% |
| United States | 9 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 8 | <1% |
| Solomon Islands | 7 | <1% |
| Côte d'Ivoire | 4 | <1% |
| Korea, Democratic People's Republic of | 4 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 41 | 2% |
| Unknown | 1623 | 68% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2376 | 99% |
| Scientists | 18 | <1% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | <1% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 3 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 59 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 15% |
| Researcher | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 14% |
| Unknown | 11 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 28 | 47% |
| Environmental Science | 11 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 8% |
| Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 10 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 389. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2024.
All research outputs
#81,550
of 26,067,272 outputs
Outputs from New Phytologist
#7
of 9,871 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,751
of 346,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New Phytologist
#1
of 155 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,067,272 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,871 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,243 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 155 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.