↓ Skip to main content

A review of the application and contribution of discrete choice experiments to inform human resources policy interventions

Overview of attention for article published in Human Resources for Health, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
133 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
197 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A review of the application and contribution of discrete choice experiments to inform human resources policy interventions
Published in
Human Resources for Health, July 2009
DOI 10.1186/1478-4491-7-62
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mylene Lagarde, Duane Blaauw

Abstract

Although the factors influencing the shortage and maldistribution of health workers have been well-documented by cross-sectional surveys, there is less evidence on the relative determinants of health workers' job choices, or on the effects of policies designed to address these human resources problems. Recently, a few studies have adopted an innovative approach to studying the determinants of health workers' job preferences. In the absence of longitudinal datasets to analyse the decisions that health workers have actually made, authors have drawn on methods from marketing research and transport economics and used Discrete Choice Experiments to analyse stated preferences of health care providers for different job characteristics. We carried out a literature review of studies using discrete choice experiments to investigate human resources issues related to health workers, both in developed and developing countries. Several economic and health systems bibliographic databases were used, and contacts were made with practitioners in the field to identify published and grey literature. Ten studies were found that used discrete choice experiments to investigate the job preferences of health care providers. The use of discrete choice experiments techniques enabled researchers to determine the relative importance of different factors influencing health workers' choices. The studies showed that non-pecuniary incentives are significant determinants, sometimes more powerful than financial ones. The identified studies also emphasized the importance of investigating the preferences of different subgroups of health workers. Discrete choice experiments are a valuable tool for informing decision-makers on how to design strategies to address human resources problems. As they are relatively quick and cheap survey instruments, discrete choice experiments present various advantages for informing policies in developing countries, where longitudinal labour market data are seldom available. Yet they are complex research instruments requiring expertise in a number of different areas. Therefore it is essential that researchers also understand the potential limitations of discrete choice experiment methods.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 197 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 4 2%
Canada 3 2%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Germany 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 186 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 36 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 15%
Student > Master 24 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 14 7%
Other 12 6%
Other 43 22%
Unknown 39 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 20%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 31 16%
Social Sciences 17 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 6%
Other 33 17%
Unknown 50 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2023.
All research outputs
#8,543,833
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Human Resources for Health
#855
of 1,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,920
of 122,258 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Resources for Health
#6
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,261 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,258 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.