You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The Habitats Humans Provide: Factors affecting the diversity and composition of arthropods in houses
|
---|---|
Published in |
Scientific Reports, November 2017
|
DOI | 10.1038/s41598-017-15584-2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Misha Leong, Matthew A. Bertone, Amy M. Savage, Keith M. Bayless, Robert R. Dunn, Michelle D. Trautwein |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 57 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 18 | 32% |
United Kingdom | 6 | 11% |
Australia | 4 | 7% |
Canada | 3 | 5% |
Spain | 1 | 2% |
Poland | 1 | 2% |
Japan | 1 | 2% |
Mexico | 1 | 2% |
Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 21 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 45 | 79% |
Scientists | 9 | 16% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 52 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 12 | 23% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 17% |
Student > Master | 5 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 8% |
Researcher | 4 | 8% |
Other | 10 | 19% |
Unknown | 8 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 37% |
Environmental Science | 7 | 13% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 8% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 6% |
Arts and Humanities | 2 | 4% |
Other | 7 | 13% |
Unknown | 10 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 691. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2024.
All research outputs
#30,498
of 25,630,321 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#483
of 142,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#574
of 340,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#17
of 4,420 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,630,321 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 142,144 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,158 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,420 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.