↓ Skip to main content

Early teen marriage and future poverty

Overview of attention for article published in Demography, August 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
18 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
38 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
10 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
100 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
268 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Early teen marriage and future poverty
Published in
Demography, August 2010
DOI 10.1353/dem.0.0120
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gordon B. Dahl

Abstract

Both early teen marriage and dropping out of high school have historically been associated with a variety of negative outcomes, including higher poverty rates throughout life. Are these negative outcomes due to preexisting differences, or do they represent the causal effect of marriage and schooling choices? To better understand the true personal and societal consequences, in this article, I use an instrumental variables (IV) approach that takes advantage of variation in state laws regulating the age at which individuals are allowed to marry, drop out of school, and begin work. The baseline IV estimate indicates that a woman who marries young is 31 percentage points more likely to live in poverty when she is older. Similarly, a woman who drops out of school is 11 percentage points more likely to be poor. The results are robust to a variety of alternative specifications and estimation methods, including limited information maximum likelihood (LIML) estimation and a control function approach. While grouped ordinary least squares (OLS) estimates for the early teen marriage variable are also large, OLS estimates based on individual-level data are small, consistent with a large amount of measurement error

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 268 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 264 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 46 17%
Student > Bachelor 45 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 11%
Researcher 20 7%
Lecturer 15 6%
Other 45 17%
Unknown 68 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 57 21%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 37 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 25 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 8%
Arts and Humanities 12 4%
Other 36 13%
Unknown 79 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 204. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2023.
All research outputs
#197,613
of 25,870,142 outputs
Outputs from Demography
#51
of 2,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#465
of 106,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Demography
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,870,142 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,025 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,392 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them