↓ Skip to main content

ニガクリタケ中毒による消化管障害を内視鏡的に観察し得た1例

Overview of attention for article published in GASTROENTEROLOGICAL ENDOSCOPY, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
ニガクリタケ中毒による消化管障害を内視鏡的に観察し得た1例
Published in
GASTROENTEROLOGICAL ENDOSCOPY, May 2012
DOI 10.11280/gee.54.1457
Authors

伊藤 錬磨, 金子 佳史, 中西 宏佳, 辻 国広, 吉田 尚弘, 冨永 桂, 辻 重継, 竹村 健一, 山田 真也, 土山 寿志

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2017.
All research outputs
#17,295,853
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from GASTROENTEROLOGICAL ENDOSCOPY
#80
of 145 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,340
of 175,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age from GASTROENTEROLOGICAL ENDOSCOPY
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 145 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,852 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them