↓ Skip to main content

Emergency Department waiting times in a tertiary children’s hospital in Israel: a retrospective cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in Israel Journal of Health Policy Research, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Emergency Department waiting times in a tertiary children’s hospital in Israel: a retrospective cohort study
Published in
Israel Journal of Health Policy Research, November 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13584-017-0184-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Oren Feldman, Raviv Allon, Ronit Leiba, Itai Shavit

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess ethnic differences in Emergency Department (ED) waiting times between Jewish and Arab children in a tertiary childrens' hospital in Israel. This was a retrospective cohort study of all children who were admitted to the pediatric ED of the largest hospital in northern Israel, between January 2011 and December 2015. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to assess the strength of association between ethnicity category and waiting time. The following were tested as possible confounders: triage category, age, gender, time of arrival category. The effect of nurse-patient ethnic concordance was assessed. Full data were available in 82,883 patients, 55,497 (67.0%) Jews and 27,386 (33.0%) Arabs. Jews and Arabs had a similar median waiting time of 38 min (interquartile range [IQR] 22-63 and IQR 21-61, respectively). Ethnicity was not associated with a change in waiting time (p = 0.36). Factors that most influenced shorter waiting time were triage category 1 (change in waiting time: -25.5%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -29.3 to -21.7), or triage category 2 (change in waiting-time: -21.8%; 95% CI: -23.7 to -20.05). Factors that most influenced longer waiting time were patient arrival during the morning shift period (change in waiting time: 5.45%; 95% CI: 4.59 to 6.31), or during the evening shift period (change in waiting time: 4.46%; 95% CI: 3.62 to 5.29). Ethnic discordance between triage nurses and patients did not yield longer waiting times. In this large pediatric cohort, ethnic differences in ED waiting time were not found.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 11%
Student > Master 2 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 13 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 6 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 21%
Decision Sciences 1 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 4%
Unknown 14 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2017.
All research outputs
#18,576,001
of 23,007,887 outputs
Outputs from Israel Journal of Health Policy Research
#408
of 580 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#251,432
of 328,166 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Israel Journal of Health Policy Research
#14
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,007,887 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 580 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,166 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.