↓ Skip to main content

Effect of a national primary care pay for performance scheme on emergency hospital admissions for ambulatory care sensitive conditions: controlled longitudinal study

Overview of attention for article published in British Medical Journal, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
71 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
74 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
151 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effect of a national primary care pay for performance scheme on emergency hospital admissions for ambulatory care sensitive conditions: controlled longitudinal study
Published in
British Medical Journal, November 2014
DOI 10.1136/bmj.g6423
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. J. Harrison, M. Dusheiko, M. Sutton, H. Gravelle, T. Doran, M. Roland

Abstract

To estimate the impact of a national primary care pay for performance scheme, the Quality and Outcomes Framework in England, on emergency hospital admissions for ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSCs).

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 71 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
Canada 2 1%
Japan 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 143 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 18%
Researcher 22 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 15%
Unspecified 14 9%
Student > Postgraduate 13 9%
Other 53 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 66 44%
Unspecified 28 19%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 18 12%
Social Sciences 12 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 8%
Other 15 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 69. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2016.
All research outputs
#213,935
of 12,475,873 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#3,142
of 41,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,837
of 230,599 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#98
of 943 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,475,873 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 41,550 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,599 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 943 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.