↓ Skip to main content

Glycogen Storage Disease Type III diagnosis and management guidelines

Overview of attention for article published in Genetics in Medicine, July 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
241 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
247 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Glycogen Storage Disease Type III diagnosis and management guidelines
Published in
Genetics in Medicine, July 2010
DOI 10.1097/gim.0b013e3181e655b6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Priya S Kishnani, Stephanie L Austin, Pamela Arn, Deeksha S Bali, Anne Boney, Laura E Case, Wendy K Chung, Dev M Desai, Areeg El-Gharbawy, Ronald Haller, G Peter A Smit, Alastair D Smith, Lisa D Hobson-Webb, Stephanie Burns Wechsler, David A Weinstein, Michael S Watson

Abstract

Glycogen storage disease type III is a rare disease of variable clinical severity affecting primarily the liver, heart, and skeletal muscle. It is caused by deficient activity of glycogen debranching enzyme, which is a key enzyme in glycogen degradation. Glycogen storage disease type III manifests a wide clinical spectrum. Individuals with glycogen storage disease type III present with hepatomegaly, hypoglycemia, hyperlipidemia, and growth retardation. Those with type IIIa have symptoms related to liver disease and progressive muscle (cardiac and skeletal) involvement that varies in age of onset, rate of disease progression, and severity. Those with type IIIb primarily have symptoms related to liver disease. This guideline for the management of glycogen storage disease type III was developed as an educational resource for health care providers to facilitate prompt and accurate diagnosis and appropriate management of patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 247 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 242 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 39 16%
Researcher 29 12%
Other 25 10%
Student > Master 24 10%
Student > Postgraduate 19 8%
Other 47 19%
Unknown 64 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 75 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 38 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 4%
Chemistry 4 2%
Other 20 8%
Unknown 79 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2023.
All research outputs
#4,572,992
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Genetics in Medicine
#1,360
of 2,943 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,040
of 103,850 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genetics in Medicine
#4
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,943 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,850 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.