You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Patient-derived models of acquired resistance can identify effective drug combinations for cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science, November 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1126/science.1254721 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Adam S Crystal, Alice T Shaw, Lecia V Sequist, Luc Friboulet, Matthew J Niederst, Elizabeth L Lockerman, Rosa L Frias, Justin F Gainor, Arnaud Amzallag, Patricia Greninger, Dana Lee, Anuj Kalsy, Maria Gomez-Caraballo, Leila Elamine, Emily Howe, Wooyoung Hur, Eugene Lifshits, Hayley E Robinson, Ryohei Katayama, Anthony C Faber, Mark M Awad, Sridhar Ramaswamy, Mari Mino-Kenudson, A John Iafrate, Cyril H Benes, Jeffrey A Engelman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 83 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 37 | 45% |
| Spain | 5 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 5% |
| France | 2 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% |
| Austria | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 25 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 42 | 51% |
| Scientists | 30 | 36% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 594 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 1% |
| Japan | 3 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Hungary | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | <1% |
| Unknown | 568 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 148 | 25% |
| Researcher | 142 | 24% |
| Student > Bachelor | 51 | 9% |
| Other | 36 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 34 | 6% |
| Other | 99 | 17% |
| Unknown | 84 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 166 | 28% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 130 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 96 | 16% |
| Engineering | 19 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 15 | 3% |
| Other | 59 | 10% |
| Unknown | 109 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 171. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2024.
All research outputs
#243,644
of 25,863,888 outputs
Outputs from Science
#6,798
of 83,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,303
of 271,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#78
of 819 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,863,888 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,366 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 66.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,660 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 819 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.