Title |
What Critical Ethical Values Guide Strategic Planning Processes in Health Care Organizations?
|
---|---|
Published in |
AMA Journal of Ethics, November 2017
|
DOI | 10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.11.ecas1-1711 |
Pubmed ID | |
Abstract |
This case explores a fictitious hospital's use of co-creation to make a decision about redesign of inpatient units as a first step in incorporating stakeholder input into creation of governing policies. We apply a "procedural fairness" framework to reveal that conditions required for an ethical decision about space redesign were not met by using clinician and patient focus groups to obtain stakeholder input. In this article, we identify epistemic injustices resulting from this process that could undermine confidence in leadership decisions. Suggestions are offered for incorporating stakeholder input going forward that address prior shortcomings. The result should be conditions that are perceived as procedurally fair and decisions that engender confidence in institutional leadership. |
Twitter Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 33% |
United States | 2 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 3 | 50% |
Members of the public | 2 | 33% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 5 | 23% |
Researcher | 3 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 9% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Lecturer | 1 | 5% |
Other | 2 | 9% |
Unknown | 8 | 36% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 23% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 9% |
Psychology | 2 | 9% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 5% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 5% |
Other | 3 | 14% |
Unknown | 8 | 36% |