The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 71 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Interventions for the reduction of prescribed opioid use in chronic non‐cancer pain
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd010323.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christopher Eccleston, Emma Fisher, Kyla H Thomas, Leslie Hearn, Sheena Derry, Cathy Stannard, Roger Knaggs, R Andrew Moore |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 10% |
| Spain | 5 | 7% |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% |
| Cameroon | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 50 | 70% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 55 | 77% |
| Scientists | 10 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 423 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 423 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 66 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 43 | 10% |
| Researcher | 42 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 33 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 25 | 6% |
| Other | 70 | 17% |
| Unknown | 144 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 96 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 53 | 13% |
| Psychology | 48 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 18 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 12 | 3% |
| Other | 35 | 8% |
| Unknown | 161 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 56. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2021.
All research outputs
#815,056
of 26,607,108 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,429
of 13,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,817
of 341,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#33
of 257 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,607,108 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,244 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,537 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 257 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.