↓ Skip to main content

Catheter-related Candidabloodstream infection in intensive care unit patients: a subgroup analysis of the China-SCAN study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Catheter-related Candidabloodstream infection in intensive care unit patients: a subgroup analysis of the China-SCAN study
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, November 2014
DOI 10.1186/s12879-014-0594-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bo Hu, Zhaohui Du, Yan Kang, Bin Zang, Wei Cui, Bingyu Qin, Qiang Fang, Haibo Qiu, Jianguo Li

Abstract

BackgroundIn patients hospitalized in intensive care units (ICU), Candida infections are associated with increased morbidity, mortality and costs. However, previous studies reported confused risk factors for catheter-related Candida bloodstream infection (CRCBSI). The objective was to describe the risk factors, microbiology, management and outcomes of CRCBSI in the China-SCAN population.MethodsPatients with ¿1 Candida-positive peripheral blood culture were selected from the China-SCAN study. Peripheral and catheter blood samples were collected for Candida isolation. Patients with the same strain of Candida in peripheral and catheter blood samples were considered as being with CRCBSI, while patients with Candida-positive peripheral blood cultures only or different strains were considered as non-CRCBSI. Data were collected from the China-SCAN study.ResultsCRCBSI incidence in ICU was 0.03% (29/96,060), accounting for 9.86% of all candidemia observed in ICU (29/294). The proportion of CRCBSI due to Candida parapsilosis reached 33.3%, more than that of Candida albicans (28.6%). In univariate analyses, older age (P¿=¿0.028) and lower body weight (P¿=¿0.037) were associated with CRCBSI. Multivariate analysis showed that the sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score was independently associated with CRCBSI (odds ratio (OR)¿=¿1.142, 95% confidence interval¿=¿1.049-1.244, P¿=¿0.002). Catheter removal and immune enhancement therapy were often used for CRCBSI treatment.ConclusionsIn China, CRCBSI was more likely to occur in old patients with low body weight. SOFA score was independently associated with CRCBSI. Candida parapsilosis accounted for a high proportion of CRCBSI, but the difference from non-CRCBSI was not significant.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 44 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 18%
Student > Bachelor 7 16%
Researcher 5 11%
Student > Postgraduate 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 11 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 40%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Engineering 2 4%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 9 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2015.
All research outputs
#18,383,471
of 22,770,070 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#5,592
of 7,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#185,323
of 258,732 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#126
of 190 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,770,070 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,668 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,732 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 190 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.