↓ Skip to main content
What is this page? Embed badge

Nanotechnology in Dermatology

Overview of attention for article published in Anais Brasileiros de Dermatologia, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
171 Mendeley
Summary Twitter Google+ Dimensions citations
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nanotechnology in Dermatology
Published in
Anais Brasileiros de Dermatologia, January 2014
DOI 10.1590/abd1806-4841.20142228
Pubmed ID
24626657
Authors

Joao Roberto Antonio, Carlos Roberto Antonio, Izabela Lidia Soares Cardeal, Julia Maria Avelino Ballavenuto, Joao Rodrigo Oliveira

Abstract

The scientific community and general public have been exposed to a series of achievements attributed to a new area of knowledge: Nanotechnology. Both abroad and in Brazil, funding agencies have launched programs aimed at encouraging this type of research. Indeed, for many who come into contact with this subject it will be clear the key role that chemical knowledge will play in the evolution of this subject. And even more, will see that it is a science in which the basic structure is formed by distilling different areas of inter-and multidisciplinary knowledge along the lines of new paradigms. In this article, we attempt to clarify the foundations of nanotechnology, and demonstrate their contribution to new advances in dermatology as well as medicine in general. Nanotechnology is clearly the future.

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 171 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 171 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 33 19%
Student > Bachelor 30 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 9%
Researcher 12 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 5%
Other 26 15%
Unknown 45 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 37 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 12%
Chemistry 18 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 6%
Engineering 7 4%
Other 23 13%
Unknown 54 32%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2022.
All research outputs
#13,310,202
of 23,450,162 outputs
Outputs from Anais Brasileiros de Dermatologia
#335
of 923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,519
of 308,701 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Anais Brasileiros de Dermatologia
#20
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,450,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,701 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.

This page is provided by Altmetric.