↓ Skip to main content

Coastal evidence for Holocene subduction-zone earthquakes and tsunamis in central Chile

Overview of attention for article published in Quaternary Science Reviews, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
9 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Coastal evidence for Holocene subduction-zone earthquakes and tsunamis in central Chile
Published in
Quaternary Science Reviews, April 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.quascirev.2014.10.015
Authors

Tina Dura, Marco Cisternas, Benjamin P. Horton, Lisa L. Ely, Alan R. Nelson, Robert L. Wesson, Jessica E. Pilarczyk

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Chile 2 2%
Jamaica 1 1%
Unknown 82 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 17%
Researcher 13 15%
Student > Master 11 13%
Student > Bachelor 10 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 9%
Other 16 18%
Unknown 14 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 45 52%
Environmental Science 6 7%
Engineering 6 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 21 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2019.
All research outputs
#1,714,267
of 17,739,146 outputs
Outputs from Quaternary Science Reviews
#542
of 2,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,831
of 238,946 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Quaternary Science Reviews
#10
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,739,146 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,954 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,946 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.