↓ Skip to main content

Eye movements and their functions in everyday tasks

Overview of attention for article published in Eye, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
171 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Eye movements and their functions in everyday tasks
Published in
Eye, November 2014
DOI 10.1038/eye.2014.275
Pubmed ID
Authors

T Foulsham

Abstract

Human saccades and fixations have numerous functions in complex everyday tasks, which have sometimes been neglected in simple experimental situations. In this review I describe some of the characteristics of eye movement behaviour during real-world interactions with objects, while walking in natural environments and while holding a conversation. When performing real-world actions and walking around the world, we fixate relevant features at critical time points during the task. The eye movements between these fixations are planned and coordinated alongside head and body movements, often occurring a short time before the corresponding action. In social interactions, eye movements are both a mechanism for taking in information (for example, when looking at someone's face or following their gaze) and for signalling one's attention to another person. Thus eye movements are specific to a particular task context and subject to high-level planning and control during everyday actions.Eye advance online publication, 14 November 2014; doi:10.1038/eye.2014.275.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 171 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Finland 2 1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 166 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 21%
Student > Bachelor 22 13%
Student > Master 21 12%
Researcher 13 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Other 29 17%
Unknown 40 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 39 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 10%
Neuroscience 13 8%
Computer Science 11 6%
Engineering 9 5%
Other 35 20%
Unknown 47 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2023.
All research outputs
#3,764,415
of 23,495,502 outputs
Outputs from Eye
#426
of 4,265 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,225
of 259,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Eye
#6
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,495,502 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,265 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,833 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.