You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Consequences of habitat change and resource selection specialization for population limitation in cavity‐nesting birds
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Applied Ecology, December 2014
|
DOI | 10.1111/1365-2664.12375 |
Authors |
Thomas E. Martin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 25% |
Italy | 1 | 13% |
United States | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 75% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
Scientists | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 1 | 1% |
Romania | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 92 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 19 | 20% |
Student > Master | 15 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 10 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 9% |
Other | 10 | 11% |
Unknown | 19 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 47 | 50% |
Environmental Science | 21 | 22% |
Unspecified | 1 | 1% |
Computer Science | 1 | 1% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 1% |
Other | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 22 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2014.
All research outputs
#6,152,367
of 24,571,708 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Ecology
#2,380
of 3,907 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,292
of 370,198 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Ecology
#25
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,571,708 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,907 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.0. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,198 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.