Title |
Lost, but Found with Nile Red: A Novel Method for Detecting and Quantifying Small Microplastics (1 mm to 20 μm) in Environmental Samples
|
---|---|
Published in |
Environmental Science & Technology, November 2017
|
DOI | 10.1021/acs.est.7b04512 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Gabriel Erni-Cassola, Matthew I. Gibson, Richard C. Thompson, Joseph A. Christie-Oleza |
Abstract |
Marine plastic debris is a global environmental problem. Surveys have shown that plastic particles <5 mm in size, known as microplastics, are significantly more abundant in surface seawater and on shorelines than larger plastic particles. Nevertheless, quantification of microplastics in the environment is hampered by a lack of adequate high throughput methods to distinguish and quantify smaller size fractions (<1 mm), and this has probably resulted in an underestimation of actual microplastic concentrations. Here we present a protocol that allows high throughput detection and automated quantification of small microplastic particles (20-1000 µm) using the dye Nile red, fluorescence microscopy and image analysis software. This protocol has proven highly effective in the quantification of small polyethylene, polypropylene, polystyrene and nylon 6 particles, which frequently occur in the water column. Our preliminary results from sea surface tows show a power-law increase of small microplastics (i.e. <1 mm) with decreasing particle size. Hence, our data helps to resolve speculation on the 'apparent' loss of this fraction from surface waters. We consider that this method presents a step change in the ability to detect small microplastics by substituting the subjectivity of human visual sorting with a sensitive and semi-automated procedure. |
Twitter Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 12 | 44% |
United States | 2 | 7% |
Spain | 2 | 7% |
Switzerland | 2 | 7% |
Australia | 1 | 4% |
Brazil | 1 | 4% |
Canada | 1 | 4% |
Austria | 1 | 4% |
Denmark | 1 | 4% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 4 | 15% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 15 | 56% |
Scientists | 11 | 41% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 862 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 161 | 19% |
Student > Master | 146 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 106 | 12% |
Researcher | 100 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 41 | 5% |
Other | 125 | 15% |
Unknown | 183 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 219 | 25% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 91 | 11% |
Chemistry | 86 | 10% |
Engineering | 60 | 7% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 37 | 4% |
Other | 118 | 14% |
Unknown | 251 | 29% |