↓ Skip to main content

Shaping the oral microbiota through intimate kissing

Overview of attention for article published in Microbiome, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#1 of 893)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
85 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
295 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Shaping the oral microbiota through intimate kissing
Published in
Microbiome, November 2014
DOI 10.1186/2049-2618-2-41
Pubmed ID
Authors

Remco Kort, Martien Caspers, Astrid van de Graaf, Wim van Egmond, Bart Keijser, Guus Roeselers

Abstract

The variation of microbial communities associated with the human body can be the cause of many factors, including the human genetic makeup, diet, age, surroundings, and sexual behavior. In this study, we investigated the effects of intimate kissing on the oral microbiota of 21 couples by self-administered questionnaires about their past kissing behavior and by the evaluation of tongue and salivary microbiota samples in a controlled kissing experiment. In addition, we quantified the number of bacteria exchanged during intimate kissing by the use of marker bacteria introduced through the intake of a probiotic yoghurt drink by one of the partners prior to a second intimate kiss.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,062 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 295 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 9 3%
Japan 4 1%
United Kingdom 3 1%
Germany 3 1%
Canada 3 1%
France 2 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Estonia 1 <1%
Other 3 1%
Unknown 265 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 59 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 54 18%
Student > Master 41 14%
Student > Bachelor 41 14%
Professor 17 6%
Other 65 22%
Unknown 18 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 121 41%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 36 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 34 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 16 5%
Psychology 12 4%
Other 51 17%
Unknown 25 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2087. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2020.
All research outputs
#1,381
of 15,574,737 outputs
Outputs from Microbiome
#1
of 893 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16
of 301,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbiome
#1
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,574,737 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 893 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 301,244 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.