↓ Skip to main content

Gerrymandering and computational redistricting

Overview of attention for article published in arXiv, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
245 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Gerrymandering and computational redistricting
Published in
arXiv, August 2019
DOI 10.1007/s42001-019-00053-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Olivia Guest, Frank J. Kanayet, Bradley C. Love

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 245 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 50%
Researcher 2 33%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 2 33%
Social Sciences 1 17%
Neuroscience 1 17%
Psychology 1 17%
Unknown 1 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 166. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2020.
All research outputs
#98,977
of 14,548,149 outputs
Outputs from arXiv
#1,252
of 555,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,270
of 314,027 outputs
Outputs of similar age from arXiv
#68
of 22,107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,548,149 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 555,052 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,027 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22,107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.