You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
Applications of the Bacteriophage Mu In Vitro Transposition Reaction and Genome Manipulation via Electroporation of DNA Transposition Complexes
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 20 |
Book title |
Bacteriophages
|
Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2018
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-7343-9_20 |
Pubmed ID | |
Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-7341-5, 978-1-4939-7343-9
|
Authors |
Saija Haapa-Paananen, Harri Savilahti |
Abstract |
The capacity of transposable elements to insert into the genomes has been harnessed during the past decades to various in vitro and in vivo applications. This chapter describes in detail the general protocols and principles applicable for the Mu in vitro transposition reaction as well as the assembly of DNA transposition complexes that can be electroporated into bacterial cells to accomplish efficient gene delivery. These techniques with their modifications potentiate various gene and genome modification applications, which are discussed briefly here, and the reader is referred to the original publications for further details. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
France | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 44% |
Student > Master | 2 | 22% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 1 | 11% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 44% |
Chemical Engineering | 2 | 22% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 11% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 1 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2018.
All research outputs
#14,958,596
of 23,007,887 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#4,728
of 13,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#255,679
of 442,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#508
of 1,498 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,007,887 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,157 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,278 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,498 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.