↓ Skip to main content

A comparative analysis of the relationship between learning styles and mathematics performance

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of STEM Education, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
3 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
129 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A comparative analysis of the relationship between learning styles and mathematics performance
Published in
International Journal of STEM Education, August 2014
DOI 10.1186/2196-7822-1-3
Authors

Vania J Ma, Xin Ma

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 126 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 13%
Lecturer 17 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 12%
Student > Bachelor 11 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 4%
Other 16 12%
Unknown 47 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 25 19%
Mathematics 23 18%
Computer Science 9 7%
Psychology 7 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 2%
Other 13 10%
Unknown 49 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2015.
All research outputs
#5,462,520
of 22,770,070 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of STEM Education
#109
of 346 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,576
of 236,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of STEM Education
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,770,070 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 346 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,467 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.