↓ Skip to main content

Co-Creating an Expansive Health Care Learning System

Overview of attention for article published in AMA Journal of Ethics, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
58 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Co-Creating an Expansive Health Care Learning System
Published in
AMA Journal of Ethics, November 2017
DOI 10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.11.medu1-1711
Pubmed ID
Abstract

How should practices of co-creation be integrated into health professions education? Although co-creation permits a variety of interpretations, we argue that realizing a transformative vision of co-creation-one that invites professionals to genuinely reconsider the purposes, relationships, norms, and priorities of health care systems through new forms of collaborative thought and practice-will require radically rethinking existing approaches to professional education. The meaningful enactment of co-creative roles and practices requires health professionals and students to negotiate competing traditions, pressures, and expectations. We therefore suggest that the development of what we call an "expansive health care learning system" is crucial for supporting learners in meeting the challenges of establishing genuinely co-creative health care systems.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 58 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 19%
Other 3 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 10%
Lecturer 2 10%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 4 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 43%
Social Sciences 3 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 10%
Psychology 2 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 3 14%