The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Taming Hazardous Chemistry in Flow: The Continuous Processing of Diazo and Diazonium Compounds
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Chemistry - A European Journal, November 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/chem.201404348 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Benjamin J. Deadman, Stuart G. Collins, Anita R. Maguire |
| Abstract |
The synthetic utilities of the diazo and diazonium groups are matched only by their reputation for explosive decomposition. Continuous processing technology offers new opportunities to make and use these versatile intermediates at a range of scales with improved safety over traditional batch processes. In this minireview, the state of the art in the continuous flow processing of reactive diazo and diazonium species is discussed. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 14% |
| Pakistan | 1 | 14% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 14% |
| Ireland | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
| Scientists | 3 | 43% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 104 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 28% |
| Researcher | 25 | 23% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 13 | 12% |
| Unknown | 19 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 70 | 65% |
| Chemical Engineering | 8 | 7% |
| Engineering | 5 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | <1% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 21 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2014.
All research outputs
#6,000,767
of 24,629,540 outputs
Outputs from Chemistry - A European Journal
#4,841
of 22,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,676
of 371,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chemistry - A European Journal
#66
of 277 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,629,540 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,968 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,220 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 277 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.