↓ Skip to main content

Erratum: The neuropeptide NMU amplifies ILC2-driven allergic lung inflammation

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Erratum: The neuropeptide NMU amplifies ILC2-driven allergic lung inflammation
Published in
Nature, November 2017
DOI 10.1038/nature24480
Pubmed ID
Authors

Antonia Wallrapp, Samantha J. Riesenfeld, Patrick R. Burkett, Raja-Elie E. Abdulnour, Jackson Nyman, Danielle Dionne, Matan Hofree, Michael S. Cuoco, Christopher Rodman, Daneyal Farouq, Brian J. Haas, Timothy L. Tickle, John J. Trombetta, Pankaj Baral, Christoph S. N. Klose, Tanel Mahlakõiv, David Artis, Orit Rozenblatt-Rosen, Isaac M. Chiu, Bruce D. Levy, Monika S. Kowalczyk, Aviv Regev, Vijay K. Kuchroo

Abstract

This corrects the article DOI: 10.1038/nature24029.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2017.
All research outputs
#7,040,504
of 13,297,009 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#61,973
of 69,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,777
of 308,270 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#769
of 825 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,297,009 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 69,087 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 75.3. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,270 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 825 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.