↓ Skip to main content

Erratum: The neuropeptide NMU amplifies ILC2-driven allergic lung inflammation

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Erratum: The neuropeptide NMU amplifies ILC2-driven allergic lung inflammation
Published in
Nature, November 2017
DOI 10.1038/nature24480
Pubmed ID
Authors

Antonia Wallrapp, Samantha J. Riesenfeld, Patrick R. Burkett, Raja-Elie E. Abdulnour, Jackson Nyman, Danielle Dionne, Matan Hofree, Michael S. Cuoco, Christopher Rodman, Daneyal Farouq, Brian J. Haas, Timothy L. Tickle, John J. Trombetta, Pankaj Baral, Christoph S. N. Klose, Tanel Mahlakõiv, David Artis, Orit Rozenblatt-Rosen, Isaac M. Chiu, Bruce D. Levy, Monika S. Kowalczyk, Aviv Regev, Vijay K. Kuchroo

Abstract

This corrects the article DOI: 10.1038/nature24029.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2017.
All research outputs
#14,084,634
of 23,007,887 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#83,140
of 91,334 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,714
of 324,977 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#880
of 938 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,007,887 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 91,334 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 99.6. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,977 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 938 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.