↓ Skip to main content

Pathological circuit function underlying addiction and anxiety disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Neuroscience, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
169 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
542 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pathological circuit function underlying addiction and anxiety disorders
Published in
Nature Neuroscience, November 2014
DOI 10.1038/nn.3849
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andreas Lüthi, Christian Lüscher

Abstract

Current models of addiction and anxiety stem from the idea that aberrant function and remodeling of neural circuits cause the pathological behaviors. According to this hypothesis, a disease-defining experience (for example, drug reward or stress) would trigger specific forms of synaptic plasticity, which in susceptible subjects would become persistent and lead to the disease. While the notion of synaptic diseases has received much attention, no candidate disorder has been sufficiently investigated to yield new, rational therapies that could be tested in the clinic. Here we review the arguments in favor of abnormal neuronal plasticity underlying addiction and anxiety disorders, with a focus on the functional diversity of neurons that make up the circuits involved. We argue that future research must strive to obtain a comprehensive description of the relevant functional anatomy. This will allow identification of molecular mechanisms that govern the induction and expression of disease-relevant plasticity in identified neurons. To establish causality, one will have to test whether normalization of function can reverse pathological behavior. With these elements in hand, it will be possible to propose blueprints for manipulations to be tested in translational studies. The challenge is daunting, but new techniques, above all optogenetics, may enable decisive advances.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 542 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 11 2%
France 6 1%
Brazil 3 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Chile 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Belgium 2 <1%
Other 9 2%
Unknown 501 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 133 25%
Researcher 115 21%
Student > Bachelor 50 9%
Student > Master 45 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 33 6%
Other 101 19%
Unknown 65 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 158 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 144 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 57 11%
Psychology 44 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 2%
Other 34 6%
Unknown 92 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2019.
All research outputs
#1,245,622
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Nature Neuroscience
#1,865
of 5,702 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,823
of 372,198 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Neuroscience
#35
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,702 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 57.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,198 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.