You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A heuristic approach to global landslide susceptibility mapping
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Natural Hazards, February 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11069-017-2757-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thomas Stanley, Dalia B. Kirschbaum |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 301 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 299 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 52 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 52 | 17% |
| Researcher | 45 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 6% |
| Other | 32 | 11% |
| Unknown | 79 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 94 | 31% |
| Engineering | 43 | 14% |
| Environmental Science | 35 | 12% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 20 | 7% |
| Unknown | 100 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2021.
All research outputs
#3,484,692
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Natural Hazards
#412
of 2,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,461
of 428,338 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Hazards
#3
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,132 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,338 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.