↓ Skip to main content

A heuristic approach to global landslide susceptibility mapping

Overview of attention for article published in Natural Hazards, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A heuristic approach to global landslide susceptibility mapping
Published in
Natural Hazards, February 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11069-017-2757-y
Authors

Thomas Stanley, Dalia B. Kirschbaum

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 1%
Unknown 84 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 25%
Student > Master 19 22%
Researcher 17 20%
Unspecified 9 11%
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Other 10 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 38 45%
Unspecified 15 18%
Engineering 13 15%
Environmental Science 12 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 5 6%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2017.
All research outputs
#3,900,581
of 13,182,401 outputs
Outputs from Natural Hazards
#410
of 1,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,182
of 262,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Hazards
#6
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,182,401 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,048 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,123 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.