↓ Skip to main content

The acceptability of intermittent screening and treatment versus intermittent preventive treatment during pregnancy: results from a qualitative study in Northern Ghana

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
308 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The acceptability of intermittent screening and treatment versus intermittent preventive treatment during pregnancy: results from a qualitative study in Northern Ghana
Published in
Malaria Journal, November 2014
DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-13-432
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher Pell, Arantza Meñaca, Samuel Chatio, Abraham Hodgson, Harry Tagbor, Robert Pool

Abstract

Affecting mother and child, malaria during pregnancy (MiP) provokes a double morbidity and mortality burden. Within a package of interventions to prevent MiP in endemic areas, the WHO currently recommends intermittent preventive treatment (IPTp). Concerns about anti-malarial resistance have however prompted interest in intermittent screening and treating (IST) as an alternative approach to IPTp. IST involves screening for malaria infection at scheduled antenatal care (ANC) clinic visits and treating malaria cases. In light of the need to comprehensively evaluate new interventions prior to roll out, this article explores the acceptability of IST with artemether-lumefantrine (AL) compared to IPTp with sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) and in Upper East Region, northern Ghana.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 308 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Cameroon 1 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Unknown 304 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 98 32%
Researcher 40 13%
Student > Bachelor 21 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 5%
Student > Postgraduate 13 4%
Other 43 14%
Unknown 78 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 89 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 44 14%
Social Sciences 28 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 3%
Other 41 13%
Unknown 88 29%