↓ Skip to main content

Different classes of antibiotics given to women routinely for preventing infection at caesarean section

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
6 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
190 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Different classes of antibiotics given to women routinely for preventing infection at caesarean section
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008726.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gillian ML Gyte, Lixia Dou, Juan C Vazquez

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 190 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
France 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 184 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 43 23%
Student > Bachelor 28 15%
Researcher 25 13%
Student > Postgraduate 18 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 8%
Other 37 19%
Unknown 23 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 104 55%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 7%
Social Sciences 11 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 3%
Other 21 11%
Unknown 28 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2015.
All research outputs
#2,850,541
of 12,101,174 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,234
of 7,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,860
of 266,515 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#139
of 213 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,101,174 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,515 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 213 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.