↓ Skip to main content

A Randomized Trial of Social Media From Circulation

Overview of attention for article published in Circulation, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
8 blogs
twitter
214 tweeters
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
4 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
117 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Randomized Trial of Social Media From Circulation
Published in
Circulation, January 2015
DOI 10.1161/circulationaha.114.013509
Pubmed ID
Authors

Caroline S. Fox, Marc A. Bonaca, John J. Ryan, Joseph M. Massaro, Karen Barry, Joseph Loscalzo

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 214 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 4%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Unknown 96 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 16 16%
Student > Master 13 13%
Researcher 12 12%
Librarian 8 8%
Student > Postgraduate 7 7%
Other 23 23%
Unknown 23 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 32%
Social Sciences 8 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 4%
Other 17 17%
Unknown 30 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 191. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2022.
All research outputs
#170,917
of 22,761,738 outputs
Outputs from Circulation
#523
of 19,644 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,122
of 352,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation
#6
of 169 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,761,738 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,644 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,273 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 169 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.