↓ Skip to main content
Embed badge What is this page?

Body-focused repetitive behavior disorders in ICD-11

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley

What is this page?

Summary Twitter Wikipedia
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Body-focused repetitive behavior disorders in ICD-11
Published in
Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria, January 2014
DOI 10.1590/1516-4446-2013-1228
Pubmed ID
25388613
Authors

Jon E. Grant, Dan J. Stein

Abstract

This article addresses the question of how body-focused repetitive behavior disorders (e.g., trichotillomania and skin-picking disorder) should be characterized in ICD-11. The article reviews the historical nosology of the two disorders and the current approaches in DSM-5 and ICD-10. Although data are limited and mixed regarding the optimal relationship between body-focused repetitive behavior disorders and nosological categories, these conditions should be included within the obsessive-compulsive and related disorders category, as this is how most clinicians see these behaviors, and as this may optimize clinical utility. The descriptions of these disorders should largely mirror those in DSM-5, given the evidence from recent field surveys. The recommendations regarding ICD-11 and body-focused repetitive behavior disorders should promote the global identification and treatment of these conditions in primary care settings.

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 1%
Unknown 76 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 17%
Student > Bachelor 11 14%
Researcher 9 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 12%
Student > Postgraduate 7 9%
Other 16 21%
Unknown 12 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 29 38%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 25%
Neuroscience 3 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 14 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2021.
All research outputs
#6,943,974
of 22,770,070 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria
#231
of 843 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,093
of 305,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria
#4
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,770,070 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 843 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,312 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.

This page is provided by Altmetric.