You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluation of orthodontic mini-implant placement: a CBCT study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Progress in Orthodontics, November 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40510-014-0061-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shilpa Kalra, Tulika Tripathi, Priyank Rai, Anup Kanase |
| Abstract |
Optimal positioning of orthodontic mini-implants is essential for a successful treatment with skeletal anchorage. This study aims to compare the accuracy of two-dimensional radiographs with a cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) for mini-implant placement. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 144 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 29 | 20% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 19 | 13% |
| Researcher | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 14% |
| Unknown | 49 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 80 | 55% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Psychology | 3 | 2% |
| Engineering | 2 | 1% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 50 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2014.
All research outputs
#15,168,167
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Progress in Orthodontics
#81
of 255 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,656
of 369,872 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Progress in Orthodontics
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 255 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,872 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.